What is even more interesting is the fact that in this rapid world of talent acquisition, a company has a serious dilemma as to whether they should employ a recruiter or a talent advisor. This is because even though both involve sourcing and attracting talent, there are different values and ways in which they go about doing this.
Recruiters are often viewed as the sequence or order acceptors and this may include the love to get it done even if in the wrong way within the Alliance. To begin with, they may fixate on the process of placing people into clear existent jobs as fast as they can, even disregarding the consequences of poor quality leads or worse, productivity dips.
Talent advisors take an approach that is called strategic. They engage in more than simply filling job orders – they seek to understand the organization and its culture. Instead, they spend time courting candidates for a better match of the company and the individual.
Focus: Recruiters are in the business of filling roles while talent advisors are interested in getting the best person for your organization.
Approach: Many times, recruiters have a short-term view but there are those talent advisors who have a long-term view.
Value Proposition: Recruiters are more inclined to use a service-oriented approach while talent advisors are more inclined to give advice and assistance.
Consider the recruiter a pro archer, searching for a candidate worthy of attention. In other words, the recruiter has to get the particular vacancy filled at the earliest possible without much concern about the fit in the long term.
Think of a talent advisor as a brilliant tactician looking down on the warring parties from the trees. Such an advisor does not seek only the filling of the vacancy but also the person who will best fit the role in terms of a specific mission of the company. They value less the time within which the task is completed and more how effective the work is going to be in the future.
Therefore, in this case, a recruiter takes on the role of a frontiersman, and the talent advisor takes on the role of a strategist. These are two equally relevant functions within the matter of recruitment, however, their methods and aims vary quite a lot, in the latter half of this statement.
Although there is a great deal of overlap between the two roles of recruiter and talent advisor, there is a great deal of difference in their approach, responsibilities, and value proposition. This is a summary of the main differences:
Recruiters: Tend to pay a lot of attention to crowding and solving the existing gaps and problems of the solicitations in a given point of time.
Talent Advisors: On the other hand, expand the area inwards as outward thinking including the time value of treasuring assets for the strategic growth of the business which the employee will aide sustain.
Recruiters: Mostly tend to rigidly abide by the recruitment model and system and most, if not all, use the applicant tracking systems (ATS) to supervise candidates.
Talent Advisors: Some may use all the applicable and merits within the turn key solution offering, hence this is more suited to addressing the recruitment backbone aspect of the particular organizational culture.
Recruiters: More often than not, work towards a specific budget and are likely to be more economical due to financial considerations.
Talent Advisors: Might have a less rigid financial policy and as such are able to pump more resources including employers’ branding and reputation management to lure potential employees.
Recruiters: Tend to concentrate on recruiting as most of their activities focus on ‘filling the gap’ rather than employment strategies.
Talent Advisors: That is a more defensive position, so they explain how to Staff, Brand, and Plan for the future of the organization.
In the simplest terms, recruiters are the doers and talent advisors are the thinkers. These two roles are both critical, however their workings give way to a more sensible approach to agitating any organization’s employment needs.
So, which one of these positions makes more sense for your business? Your particular requirements, ambitions, and resources will dictate the answer.
If you are a small company with restricted resources and want to fill turnaround vacancies, then a recruiter will be enough. However, in the case of larger corporations where there is a long-term strategy to be followed as retention and acquisition of highly skilled employees a talent advisor comes in handy. When making a decision, consider the next aspects:
Evaluating these factors will assist you in making a prudent choice that will benefit your organization in meeting its recruiting goals.
Before arriving at any decisions, think hard about the below issues:
1. Long-Term Hiring Goals:
2. Current State of Talent Acquisition:
3. Employer Branding;
4. Budget and Investment:
5. Industry Expertise and Niche Requirements:
6. Data-Driven Decision Making:
7. Communication Style and Involvement:
By asking yourself these questions, you will understand the factors necessary for making the decision and pick an appropriate associate for the fulfillment of your organization’s talent acquisition.
Whether to hire a recruiter or a talent advisor is similar to using the right-tool-for-the-right-application principle. Both of them can be useful when looking for top talent, but the differences in their methods and expertise are substantial.
Now, here is a summary of the essential distinctions:
Focus: While recruiters seek to fill vacancies, talent advisors’s goal is to identify individuals who will be an asset to the organization.
Approach: Recruiters are often transactional in nature while talent advisors strategize for a long-term working relationship.
Proposition of value - Recruiters provide a service that is transactional, but talent advisors support the strategy.
Last but not least, kindly give consideration to the following when making any purchase or hiring decision:
Always remember that no response is assured. The most suitable and appropriate choice for your company will rest on the particular needs and priorities of the organization in question. Be inquisitive and look for alternative possibilities. A recruiter or talent advisor is potentially beneficial to your team but only as much as the goals and values match within the two. In the end, it is your call. Do a self-assessment and identification of the best partner that will assist you in achieving your hiring goals.
If you’re a recruiter or a talent advisor, you can benefit from Nurturebox in the following ways:
Improve productivity: Minimise the dealing of manual tasks and enhance the hiring process.
Candidate experience: Give candidates a good enjoyable experience.
Cost saving: Automate processes and ease the workflows thereby saving time and money.
Go beyond intuition and guesswork: Harness the power of analytics to refine your hiring strategies.
Recruitment